ThreatConnect does not currently offer SCIM-based user provisioning. Stepwork automates ThreatConnect provisioning with 98% accuracy — no API required.
No SCIM Support Complexity Vector: Analyst permissions, investigations, and integrations are high-risk and stateful. APIs expose data but don’t validate safe operational outcomes.
Threat intelligence must be traceable from alert to response, yet evidence in ThreatConnect is often spread across tools. This complicates audit validation of detection and response controls, which is why teams use Stepwork to automate ThreatConnect flows with 98% accuracy without needing an API.
ThreatConnect supports SAML sign-on. Stepwork authenticates through your existing identity provider — the same way your employees do.
No. ThreatConnect does not currently offer SCIM-based user provisioning, leaving IT teams to manage user lifecycle changes manually.
Stepwork automates ThreatConnect provisioning through interface automation — the same way a human would, but with 98% accuracy and no API required. Record the flow once, and Stepwork runs it on demand or on a schedule.
Yes. Stepwork authenticates to ThreatConnect through your existing identity provider (Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, 1Password, etc.) and completes MFA natively — including OTP, passkeys, and push notifications. No separate credentials or service accounts are needed.
See how Stepwork provisions users in ThreatConnect with 98% accuracy — in a 15-minute demo.
Book a DemoThe primary risk is manual work. Additional risks include leaving sensitive intelligence exposed, slows security operations. Stepwork eliminates these risks by automating the entire provisioning workflow.
No. Stepwork completes MFA exactly like a human user — supporting OTP, passkeys, push notifications, and other methods. It signs in through your existing identity provider via SAML, mirroring your organization's security posture.